• Welcome to Hair Insights Forum! This forum is dedicated to hair transplants and hair loss discussions! You can find impartial advice, share your experiences, and connect with others on the same journey.

Possible Coverage With SMP

Hello guys, I wish everyone a good day.

I'm having dilemma between having another hair transplant or SMP to increase the density on my crown and some scars on the back. Which one do you think it will be the best for my situation?

PS: I didn't know where to open the topic, sorry if it's wrong. I'm new to this forum.
 

Attachments

  • crown and back.webp
    crown and back.webp
    225.6 KB · Views: 1
If I were you, I will try SMP first since you can always get a hair transplant even you get SMP done which is much cheaper than transplant procedure.
 
Agree with DestDallas here. However, you might want to consult with some medical profeesionals before you decide if you haven't yet.
 
Hello guys, I wish everyone a good day.

I'm having dilemma between having another hair transplant or SMP to increase the density on my crown and some scars on the back. Which one do you think it will be the best for my situation?

PS: I didn't know where to open the topic, sorry if it's wrong. I'm new to this forum.

Both hair transplants and SMP (Scalp Micropigmentation) have their pros and cons, so the choice depends on your specific goals and preferences. Here's a quick breakdown to help you decide:

Hair Transplant:

Best if you still have a good donor area and want natural hair growth in the crown.

Provides a permanent solution, but it can take 8-12 months to see the final results.

Scars from previous procedures can sometimes be improved during a second transplant, but this depends on your surgeon's expertise.


SMP:

Great for creating the illusion of density, especially if your donor area is limited or thinning further isn't a concern.

It’s less invasive, has a quicker recovery time, and can also camouflage scars effectively.

However, it’s not real hair, so if you prefer to style or grow your hair, this might not meet your expectations.


If your priority is achieving more density and you still have a healthy donor area, a second transplant might be the better option. If you’re more focused on covering scars and creating a uniform look without surgery, SMP could work well.

I’d recommend consulting a few professionals to get their opinions on your specific situation before making a decision. Good luck with your journey—either option can make a big difference!"
 
Hello guys, I wish everyone a good day.

I'm having dilemma between having another hair transplant or SMP to increase the density on my crown and some scars on the back. Which one do you think it will be the best for my situation?

PS: I didn't know where to open the topic, sorry if it's wrong. I'm new to this forum.


Hello,

First of all, welcome to our community! You’re in the right place, as everyone here tries to help each other.

Regarding your question, both hair transplant and SMP (Scalp Micropigmentation) offer different advantages, and it completely depends on your needs and expectations.

If you’re looking for more hair density: A second hair transplant, especially if you have enough donor hair, could provide a more natural result. However, this process takes a bit longer and requires a recovery period.

If you want to cover scars and achieve quick results: SMP can be a great option. This method is non-surgical, and results are typically noticeable in a shorter time. However, unlike a hair transplant, SMP doesn’t add real hair; it provides an optical illusion of density.

It’s important to consider the pros and cons of both options and consult with a specialist for detailed information. Also, exploring the experiences of other members on the forum who’ve gone through similar processes could be very helpful.

Wishing you the best in your decision-making process! If you have any other questions, we’re always here. 😊
 
Back
Top